So I'm a little confused, and I think I'm getting conflicting information, so I figured I would go directly to the source.
Anyway, I'm running MQ2 with both MQ2FPS and MQ2Clip. I've been told that a) there is no real difference between this set up and WinEQ and also b) that WinEQ does a better job of handling "things".
So which is it? I'd like to know if there's any benefit to running WinEQ other than hotkeys, tiling, and that sort of thing over and above what those plugins are already getting me.
Thanks,
EQUser2002
Differences between WinEQ and MQ2FPS + MQ2Clip
Moderators: Lavish Software Team, Moderators
-
- Non-Subscriber
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:57 am
WinEQ doesnt do anything similar, but WinEQ 2 includes EQPlayNice. EQPlayNice Pro does the same things as (and slightly more than) MQ2FPS, but EQPlayNice Lite does slightly less (specifically, rendering limiting is not available in EQPlayNice Lite). As a Lite user who has access to MQ2FPS and MQ2Clip, you should probably just use those. As a Pro user, you would want to use EQPlayNice, but maybe keep MQ2Clip.