Coming Soon
Moderators: Lavish Software Team, Moderators
Coming Soon
It's coming, and it's furious
-
- Non-Subscriber
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 3:09 am
- Location: Hell
- Contact:
Could you possibaly compare Fury to A Parser such as EQWatcher?
Brother zatrekaz Nel'Keldora
Transcendent of Bertoxx
Brother zatrekaz Nel'Keldora
Transcendent of Bertoxx
A brief explanation from EQWatcher.com
Fury is basically going to be the next generation EQWatcher.EQWatcher will be replaced with a faster and more extensible product called Fury. Fury will use Lax/Blech as its parsing engine (which is based on EQWatcher's parsing engine), which is open source and found within MacroQuest 2 at http://macroquest.sourceforge.net. Fury will be much more C/C++ plugin-driven than EQWatcher, which will allow for a much wider range of information tracking, and abilities. For example, allowing spreadsheet-style tables for damage tracking the way you expect from offline log parsers. Fury also will be able to track multiple game sessions with much less effort than EQWatcher. Although the main system will be closed source, most plugins will be open source with full access to the program's features. This will allow Fury to be used for games other than EverQuest without my personal blessing.
Fury will be a commercial product, bundled with EQPlayNice and WinEQ in the MMOTools suite. Basic usage and features will be free, but with a MMOTools subscription you will be able to use full features.
-
- GamingTools Subscriber
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 9:31 am
Just so you know
Just so you know... I did a full year subscription based on Lax's reputation and excellent work on MQ2... which I a confident will translate to Fury.
I'm all a-tingle with anticipation.
I'm all a-tingle with anticipation.
-
- Non-Subscriber
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 1:54 pm
Chiming in....
Just wanted to add that I'm really looking forward to using Fury with EQ2, and I know my entire guild is interested as well. We currently use EQWatcher and love it, and can onlt imagine how much better Fury will be.
Dalo
Dalo
WoW version.
Ppppleease!
All I need to start off is BASE functionality for WoW. That means ability to read chat messages to TTS and enable/disable guild/group whatever. Heck even just something that was hard coded to read guild/group/whisper would be enough for me.
I keep missing chat messages because I am accustomed to the audible version.
Will this be something that watches the log files or something memory based? I actually LIKED that EQ-Watcher was file based because I could run it on a seperate computer and not waste memory space in my main computer and it also gave me convenient seperate volume controls.
Redvard
All I need to start off is BASE functionality for WoW. That means ability to read chat messages to TTS and enable/disable guild/group whatever. Heck even just something that was hard coded to read guild/group/whisper would be enough for me.
I keep missing chat messages because I am accustomed to the audible version.
Will this be something that watches the log files or something memory based? I actually LIKED that EQ-Watcher was file based because I could run it on a seperate computer and not waste memory space in my main computer and it also gave me convenient seperate volume controls.
Redvard
Fury can take input from any source, but must be trained to do so. Unfortunately with WoW, there is no chat log written to disk. Therefore, in order to achieve the functionality you're looking for, it would have to actually hack into the game... which is not something that I plan on doing.
As it stands, without "Hacks", Fury would only work for EQ1 and EQ2, to the best of my knowledge. This is part of the reason it's not already out. I'm working on some new stuff though
As it stands, without "Hacks", Fury would only work for EQ1 and EQ2, to the best of my knowledge. This is part of the reason it's not already out. I'm working on some new stuff though
Pardon me...
Did you just say:
a) Fury for WoW would require some underhandedness so you won't be doing it.
b) You are working on getting working "somehow" and we can expect something coming?
I haven't been able to find anything that can do TTS for the chat in WoW yet. If you have it working, you get my subscription right away.
Redvard
Did you just say:
a) Fury for WoW would require some underhandedness so you won't be doing it.
b) You are working on getting working "somehow" and we can expect something coming?
I haven't been able to find anything that can do TTS for the chat in WoW yet. If you have it working, you get my subscription right away.
Redvard